On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2003 23:47:57 +0200, Kostal wrote:
> >
> > > Make sure the files in question really are xpm files.
> >
> > It is on my home computer so I will test that as soon as I am at home,
> > however, those files are installed from the standard package
> > fvwm-icons. Do you still think they may not be real xpm files?
>
> If these are XPM files, then you didn't compiled XPM support in.
>
> Run fvwm-config --info, or try to load these images using fvwm-root.
>
> Regards,
> Mikhael.
>
I see ....... You are right:
When I run
$ fvwm-config --info
I get
Package: fvwm
Version: 2.4.16
Instalation options:
prefix: /usr/local
exec-prefix: /usr/local
bindir: /usr/local/bin
datadir: /usr/local/share
libexecdir: /usr/local/libexec
sysconfdir: /usr/local/etc
mandir: /usr/local/man
Compiled-in paths:
Module directory: /usr/local/libexec/fvwm/2.4.16
Data directory: /usr/local/share/fvwm
Default ImagePath: /usr/include/X11/bitmaps:/usr/include/X11/pixmaps
Default UserDir: $HOME/.fvwm
Support for features:
gnome-hints (window manager hints): yes
gtk (FvwmGtk): no
gdk-imlib (in FvwmGtk): no
gnome-libs (in FvwmGtk): no
multibyte: no
readline: no
rplay: no
shape (shaped windows): yes
sm (session management): yes
stroke: no
xinerama: yes
xpm: no
.....................
But during installation it looked all fine:
in-the-fvwm.src-directory:
# ./configure > aaa
# cat aaa | grep -i xpm
checking for XpmReadFileToXpmImage in -lXpm... yes
checking X11/xpm.h usability... yes
checking X11/xpm.h presence... yes
checking for X11/xpm.h... yes
checking for Xpm 3.4g or better... yes
With XPM support? yes
.........................
What went wrong? Any ideas now?
Thanks a lot!
Jan
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Sat Oct 25 2003 - 13:42:12 BST