On 25 Oct 2003 11:39:24 -0700, Jan Kostal wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
>
> > On 24 Oct 2003 23:47:57 +0200, Kostal wrote:
> > >
> > > > Make sure the files in question really are xpm files.
> > >
> > > It is on my home computer so I will test that as soon as I am at home,
> > > however, those files are installed from the standard package
> > > fvwm-icons. Do you still think they may not be real xpm files?
> >
> > If these are XPM files, then you didn't compiled XPM support in.
> >
> > Run fvwm-config --info, or try to load these images using fvwm-root.
>
> I see ....... You are right:
>
> When I run
> $ fvwm-config --info
> I get
> Package: fvwm
> Version: 2.4.16
>
> Instalation options:
> bindir: /usr/local/bin
>
> Support for features:
> xpm: no
> .....................
> But during installation it looked all fine:
> in-the-fvwm.src-directory:
> # ./configure > aaa
> # cat aaa | grep -i xpm
> checking for XpmReadFileToXpmImage in -lXpm... yes
> checking X11/xpm.h usability... yes
> checking X11/xpm.h presence... yes
> checking for X11/xpm.h... yes
> checking for Xpm 3.4g or better... yes
> With XPM support? yes
> .........................
> What went wrong? Any ideas now?
You didn't say that you didn't define your own prefix and configure says:
Executables: /usr/local/bin
You also didn't convince us you did "make install" after that.
Or maybe you did, but it failed without write permissions to /usr/local.
The only sure thing is the /usr/local/bin/fvwm executable on your system
is not that you built with the "XPM support? yes" output above.
Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Sat Oct 25 2003 - 15:02:08 BST