Re: FVWM: fvwm-3.0: developers thoughts...

From: Dan Espen <dane_at_mk.telcordia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 08:51:41 -0400

Kingsly John <kingsly_at_users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> +++ Thomas Adam [2003-09-05 11:34:51]:
>
> > I was trauling through the fvwm man page last night, and found reference
> > to certain things that will be obsolete / included in fvwm-3.0.
>
> If anything is mentioned as will be "included" in 3.0 it should be read as ..
> it won't be implemented in 2.6.0 ;-)
>
> 2.6.0 will be the next stable release.. and was/is expected to be out later t
> his
> year.
>
> > I am just curious to ask the developers how far away they think the
> > eminent fvwm3 release will be, what they plan to drastically
> > change/include into it. Will the configurations differ between 2.x.x and
> > 3.x.x do you suppose?
>
> I think it's a bit too early to have answers for those questions... but
> better wait for a developer to respond to that one! (I'm just a bystander!)

Download the source code, read the todo-3.0 file.

-- 
Dan Espen                           E-mail: dane_at_mk.telcordia.com
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Fri Sep 05 2003 - 07:54:44 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:37:55 BST