Remko Troncon <spike_at_kotnet.org> writes:
> I agree with Uwe. The current approach is a lot easier, much more
> maintainable, and gives a good overview. The threshold is a little bit
> higher, because you have to actually send a mail to someone, but maybe
> that isn't really such a bad thing after all ;-)
If the maintainer of the homepage agree with that, i will be happy ... :)
> IMHO, wiki is only suitable for early stages of a work in progress, when
> things are in a state of flux, and having centralized documents is a lot
> of overhead on synchronization. But once things stopped moving, the
> whole wiki hierarchy (which is usually a huge mess by then in which you
> get lost very quick) should be organized into centrally administered
> documents.
It could be very hard to get a centralized document of configuration
scripts. But there will be a dozen differant ways to make a panel with
FVWMButtons for example. How do you want to deal with that in a
centralized document? I think you talk about a manual but i want seomthing for
configuration. In the moment all of these things are put in the
faq. Okay for the moment ... but a faq could become very unreadable if
add a dozen alternatives for every problem on it ...
Mario
--
Chaos reigns within.
Reflect, repent, and reboot.
Order shall return.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 08:17:51 BST