On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:15:00PM -0600, Dameron, Gregg wrote:
> Sorry to bother you - no one has yet replied to this item.
Because I am the only developer with a dual head setup which I
fire up only once in a while. I did not forget it, but it will
take more time.
> I neglected to mention I'm now on Solaris 8.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dameron, Gregg
> > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 2:56 PM
> > To: 'fvwm_at_fvwm.org'
> > Subject: Dual-head pointer warping problem is back
> >
> > The problem addressed in:
> >
> > http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/archive/0112/msg00316.html
> >
> > and fixed in 2.4.5 is occurring in the latest stable release (2.4.15). To
> > summarize:
> >
> > If:
> > 1. Dual monitors are in use (non-Xinerama);
> > 2. FvwmEvent is set up to detect a new window (per FAQ 3.18);
> > 3. The command "sleep 5 ; xterm &" is entered in a terminal window on the
> > primary display (:0.0); and
> > 4. The pointer is manually moved to the secondary display (:0.1) within 5
> > seconds,
> >
> > then the pointer will warp to 0,0 of the primary display when the xterm
> > appears. The reverse is also true; i.e., if the words "secondary" and
> > "primary" are exchanged above.
> >
> > Also, if a Restart is done on one side, then the pointer is quickly moved
> > to the opposite side, it will warp back to 0,0 of the first side when the
> > restart completes. In this case, FvwmEvent need not be running.
> >
> > Can anyone else confirm this behavior?
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Tue Apr 22 2003 - 02:52:48 BST