On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:02:07AM -0500, Kendrick Vargas wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, martin sepulveda wrote:
>
> > i hate to say the obvious, but fvwm is not great, it's the best wm around.
> >
> > if there were plenty of config files i doubt anyone would be using any
> > other (bloated) wms.
>
> Actually, I think it'd be more like "if there were a graphical
> configuration client available i doubt anyone would be using any other
> (bloated) wms." At this point, I think that's all that's really keeping
> FVWM from the (now) popular gnome/kde crowd.
> -peace
Even if the default-configuration would be a little more beautifull,
that would help a lot!
BTW: I use fvwm2.5.6 together with gnome2.2, that makes gnome useable
:-) (after disableing the icons on the desktop)
Klaus
>
> --
> Let he who is without clue kiss my ass
>
> --
> Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
> To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
> message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
> To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
--
5) People say Linux is ugly. How does that make you feel?
Torvalds: They'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes.
Let's see just how ugly they think it is when they have a few
bulletholes in them.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Tue Mar 25 2003 - 12:49:34 GMT