On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:23:50AM -0500, coerver wrote:
>
>
> rant:
>
> I have been using fvwm(2) for awhile < 2.0 and think its the
> cat's meow. I recently joined the mailing list and several times I have
> wanted to address the "default" look and feel. I recently installed
> the latest stable fvwm2 on a solaris2.7 box at work and had to spend a
> good deal of time getting the conifguration to look good. The man pages
> are truly a(maze)ing ___but___ it takes time and how much time _do_ you
> _really_ want to spend configuring your window manager? I am the first to
> admit there are many things I don't understand about fvwm but I don't
> care.. I just use it and like it. The default pager could look alot
> better, the mwm-ishness could be minimized a bit etc.. etc.
>
> my point: fvwm2 could
> have a nicer default look I think...
Yes, definitely - you are telling us no news. I think it's one of
fvwm's major flaws. Fortunately, there is the fvwm-themes package
nowadays, but we should do a better job of advertising it.
> don't get me wrong.. the web site is nice, the list is great fvwm2 is the
> perfect wm... etc
> but the discussion to make default config prettier is justified and should
> continue.. sorry for the rant next time I include some concrete
> suggestions
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Fri Jan 17 2003 - 09:44:42 GMT