On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:32:51AM -0500, Mark Krenz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:29:29AM +1100, Cameron Simpson said the following:
> >
> > With FVWM's opaque move the window sees all the intermediate positions and
> > does nots of redrawing if it's transparent.
> >
>
> I think that it would be better if fvwm just kept the current state of
> the window in memory without trying to update it until you released the
> window. After all, you do an opaque move just so you can see what the
> whole window will look like in it's new place, not so that you can move
> the window around while watching it update. Can a new option be added
> to OpaqueMoveSize called 'nice', or something like that?
Yeah, just turn opaque move off if you don't like it. That's what
wire frame move is for ;-)
Seriously, there is no reliable ways to find out the window
contents to make a copy of the window that is moved around.
Bye
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Wed Jan 15 2003 - 08:10:18 GMT