On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Dan Espen wrote
> "Nikul Raval" <nikul.raval.b_at_bayer.com> writes:
> >
> > Thank you for taking time out to help.
>
> Your'e welcome, but please respond to the fvwm list.
A bit of administrivia stuff. I also hit that booby-trap when I first
subscribed. The list is set up such that by default, replies go only to
the original sender. Is this intentional on the list-admin's part ? I
subscribe to more than one list with this "feature". Here's a snippet
of the procmail code I use to write a proper "Reply-To:" line to cause
my replies to default to the list...
:0 fhw
* ^Return-Path: .owner-fvwm_at_hpc\.uh\.edu
* !^Reply-To:.*fvwm_at_hpc\.uh\.edu
| formail -i "Reply-To: fvwm_at_fvwm.org (FVWM list)"
--
Walter Dnes <waltdnes_at_waltdnes.org>
If you had purchased $1000 of _at_home stock in 1999, today you would
have $1.30. If you had purchased $1000 of beer in 1999, today you
would still have $59 in empty cans.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Sat Mar 16 2002 - 01:53:13 GMT