On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 05:13:03PM -0600, Gregg Dameron wrote:
>
> I see fvwm as the logical choice to replace fvwm95 for our end-user
> community (several hundred users). I am encouraged by your screenshot
> showing a Win-95 look and feel. I am trying to make a business case to
> my management for changing over to fvwm. Is such a change wise, or are
> we better served by continuing to enhance and bug-fix fvwm95?
I'm not sure I know what you mean by the last phrase, are you doing
your own bug fixes to fvwm95?
If so, you might find that you don't have to go it alone with fvwm2,
we accept and incorporate user supplied patches very frequently.
If you subscribe to this list for a while, I think you will agree
that fvwm support is quite good.
--
Dan Espen
444 Hoes Lane Room RRC 1C-214 E-mail: dane_at_mk.telcordia.com
Piscataway, NJ 08854 Phone: (732) 699-5570
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Tue May 15 2001 - 12:12:55 BST