On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 07:27:28PM +0200, Sampo Niskanen wrote:
> > What I suggest is a configurable option how many pixels around the corners
> > of the screen are "deactivated" from page flipping. It may sound like a
> > strange request, but I find it quite useful. Then again, it might not be
> > good for the corners where a page is diagonally located (the cursor would
> > get trapped in it when trying to move there). In that case you couldn't
> > slide it along the border to the corner anyway.
>
> I think we won't need an option here. The new 2.3.x code won't move the
> window over the page boundary as long as you keep the pointer moving
> fast enough. This should allow you what you want (with a bit of practice)
> while still fixing that weird 'move back one pixel' bug.
I hope that will be configurable. I like the consept of paging because it
gives me more desk space (I have 8x2 pages, of which I sometimes use about
10) and I want to be able to move about them as fast as I can move withing
one page (almost), so I don't want anything resisting my movement between
pages (unless I specifically want it, as in the top corners).
__________________________________________________
/____\ Sampo Niskanen <=> sampo.niskanen_at_iki.fi \
\
http://www.iki.fi/sampo.niskanen \
\ ___________________________________________
___/___________________________________________/
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Sat Nov 20 1999 - 16:06:15 GMT