Re: FVWM: Fvwm Themes rfc?

From: Nathan Froyd <nathan.froyd_at_rose-hulman.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1999 11:39:10 -0500

On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 09:59:42AM -0600, Matthew W. Roberts wrote:
> There are obviously many ideas about themes and how to implement
> them. I'm wondering ... would it make sense to take an rfc approach
> with this issue? I would be willing to coordinate such an effort
> if that would help. I'm not an FVWM expert by any means, but I
> am willing to do what I can.

I would love to see this happen and am also willing to help out. Especially
since I am the new maintainer of http://fvwm.themes.org/ and I don't want to
have the community ranting at me for a rotten method of setting up themes. :)

-- 
</nathan>  |  froydnj_at_rose-hulman.edu  |  http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~froydnj/
Is this *idiocy*? Or something so            If the human brain were so simple
brilliant that it just *looks*                that we could understand it, we
stupid? --Gary Kasparov                       would be so simple we couldn't.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.

Received on Mon Nov 15 1999 - 10:43:15 GMT