Re: FVWM: close behaviour in fvwm

From: Dominik Vogt <dominik.vogt_at_fvwm.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 08:57:57 +0200

On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 05:02:34PM +1000, shao_at_cia.com.au wrote:
> Dominik Vogt [dominik.vogt_at_fvwm.org] wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 02:34:47PM +1000, shao_at_cia.com.au wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> > >
> > > I fork them to background immediately after start up.
> > >
> > > shao:/home/shao$ licq &
> > > [1] 8950
> > >
> > > But typing exit in xterm won't kill licq. I will try your
> > > suggestions.
> >
> > Strange. Does the licq vanish if you kill the shell or the xterm
> > with 'kill -9'?
>
> No. It stays with kill -9. I have tried this with both bash and
> zsh. I also tried to run emacs from the xterm, and it has the
> same behaviour. It is nothing really important, but I just want
> to find out why....

And what happens if you use 'Delete' or 'Destroy' instead of 'Close'?
I guess this will happen with 'Destroy' but not with 'Delete'.

Bye

Dominik ^_^

-- 
Dominik Vogt, Hewlett-Packard GmbH, Dept. BVS
Herrenberger Str.130, 71034 Boeblingen, Germany
phone: 07031/14-4596, fax: 07031/14-3883, dominik_vogt_at_hp.com
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Wed Oct 13 1999 - 03:19:52 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:38:02 BST