On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 02:56:35PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > [1] hah! the more features i get, the more i come to such weird ideas!
> > fvwm2 is just too configurable ;)
>
> No, it *isn't*. Actually it's not flexible enough. Otherwise
> people would not keep asking for new features of this kind :-)
ey, come on! you dev'ping guys did great work, you know that! and all of
this for free (which means: for us). you don't have to launch
google-keyword-cheating-search-promos to spread one of the most flexible
windowmanagers all over the world. if i need something slim an lean, i
take fvwm2. if i need something big'n fat, i take fvwm2 too! that's my
opinion (for several years now).
so don't underestimate your work.
yours
andré
--
Shaw's Principle:
Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will
want to use it.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Mon Apr 09 2001 - 01:07:43 BST