Dominik Vogt <dominik_vogt_at_hp.com> said:
> I don't mind telling people it's broken. 2.1.7 is a beta.
> That explains everything. Betas may be buggy and are not
> meant to be used in production. I don't see a reason why
> we should make new releases fast becaus of bugs as long
> as they don't really break up fvwm completely.
So what do you recommend people use in production? I was under the
understanding that all of 2.x was beta. Is 2.0.46 recommended as
"production", or some sort?
> Having a release cycle that is too short might discourage
> people to use all these betas. I think 2.1.8 should not
> come before next week.
Agreed, but if you're recommending 1.x as "production", then it
should be argued that that release cycle is way too long...
- Chris
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://fvwm.math.uh.edu/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Mon Jan 11 1999 - 11:04:37 GMT