Re: FVWM: 2.1.5 build on HP-UX fails

From: Paul D. Smith <psmith_at_BayNetworks.COM>
Date: 16 Dec 1998 18:34:11 -0500

%% Dan Espen <dane_at_mk.bellcore.com> writes:

>> Now, is our requirement for xpm the same as XEmacs' (looks like they
>> want at least 3.4f)? Do we need something later? Will an earlier
>> release work?

  de> I think it's still a mystery, which is why I favored an approach that
  de> attempted to test the functionality we need rather than a release
  de> number. Of course, it is true, when we are all done, a message that
  de> says "you need a release > than ???", is better than a message that
  de> just says your xpm library doesn't work.

The question is, is _any_ xpm.h that contains XpmImage good enough? I
thought there were issues even with some later, but not late enough,
versions of Xpm.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Paul D. Smith <psmith_at_baynetworks.com>         Network Management Development
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://fvwm.math.uh.edu/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.

Received on Wed Dec 16 1998 - 17:39:13 GMT