Yes, I tried compile as you discribed and got the same results.
Don't know why or how to fix it either...
On 22-Jan-98 Mark J Hewitt wrote:
> On 22 Jan 98 at 11:41, Scott Lampert wrote:
>
>> Has anyone attempted to compile FVWM 2.0.26 with egcs 1.0.x or gcc
>> 2.8.0? Evidently Imake creates a combination of options to gcc which are
>> no longer compatible, namely -c and -o on the same line.
>
> I've not tried this combination - and I assume you mean 2.0.46 - but, are
> you sure the problem is the configuration of fvwm and not the
> default rules for the version of make that you use? GNU make in
> particular checks for this when building its default rules at
> configuration time.
> --
> Mark J. Hewitt at home mjh_at_elsabio.demon.co.uk
> --
> Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
> To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
> message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
> To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
You are lucky! When I was young we had to run UNIX on an abacus...
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Thu Jan 22 1998 - 18:57:42 GMT