Re: FVWM: Title Icons

From: Andy J. Smith <A.J.Smith_at_nortel.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 10:23:07 +0100 (BST)

On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Peter S Galbraith wrote:

>
> Steven Taetzsch wrote:
>
> > I just tried out fvwm-2.0.46 with mini icons enabled.
>
> I'm looking forward to trying this out. I've been using fvwm95 for
> about a year now, because I prefered the look of it (with mini-icons) in
> comparison to the bland look of fvwm. The mini-icons do make it much
> easier to identify things visually.
>
> So what's the major difference with fvwm95 now?
> Has anyone made a pros and cons list of comparison?

As far as I can see, the only thing I miss since switching from FVWM95 to
FVWM 2.0.45 is the taskbar. I can run the taskbar with 2.0.45, but it
seems very slow and the time at the rightmost end flickers like crazy.

Apart from that, I'm glad to have a wildly different colour scheme than
FVWM95. :)

Andy

I stayed up all night playing poker with tarot cards.
I got a full house and four people died.
(Steven Wright)

--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Thu Aug 28 1997 - 04:27:13 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:38:00 BST