Re: FVWM: FvwmIconMan 0.9.7 bug?

From: Allen Brady Montz <bradym_at_cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 09 Mar 1997 09:58:17 -0700

jmknoble_at_pobox.com writes:

> On Sun, 9 Mar 1997 jmknoble_at_pobox.com wrote:
>
> : fvwm-2.0.45, FvwmIconMan-0.9.7: anyone else experiencing the following?
>
> [...]
>
> : *FvwmIconMan*nummanagers 1
> : ## the below evaluates to 96x20 for a screen resolution of 1024x768
> ^^^^^^^^^
> : *FvwmIconMan*buttongeometry m4_eval(_WIDTH_ / 8)x20
>
> ack! i mean, it evaluates to 128x20 for 1024x768. sheesh.
>
> --jim
>

You're going to love this (or maybe not). With a screen size of 1024x768 you
will have exactly 24 pixels left over, since the FvwmIconMan that you have is
limited to a max width of 1000 pixels. It was left over from when FvwmIconMan
could only be one column, and then 1000 seemed like a fine limitation. I
haven't released another version since then, but since you've already been
editing the code, you should change line 718 of x.c from:

 sizehints.max_width = 1000;
to
 sizehints.max_width = globals.screenx;

There you go. I'll release a 0.9.7a which has this soon.

-- 
 Brady Montz
 bradym_at_cs.arizona.edu
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Sun Mar 09 1997 - 10:58:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:38:00 BST