Trebor A. Rude wrote:
>
> --- On Fri, 30 Aug 1996 00:22:36 +0200 Guenther Grau <grau_at_fzi.de> wrote:
>
> >Thus, whenever you have a copy of the program you want to swallow running, it
> >won't swallow it.
>
> It's not supposed to. That's what the "UseOld" option to Swallow is
> for, no?
No, but my wording was a bit unclear. Let me rephrase it:
*FvwmButtons - whatever Swallow "XLoad" Exec xload -nolabel &
*FvwmButtons - whatever Swallow "XClock" Exec xclock&
What happened to me was, it executed and swallowed xload just fine,
executed xclock fine as well, but didn't swallow it. This was just
because I had another copy of xclock running. Thus, whenever you have a
copy of the program you want to swallow running, it won't swallow the
newly executed one, which is a bug (and it doesn't swallow the old one,
which is correct, unless you use "UseOld" option :-).
Guenther
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Fri Aug 30 1996 - 08:41:49 BST