On Mon Mar 25, 96, at 17:45:22, Dave Goldberg wrote :
JT> But maybe there should be a DestroyModule function to destroy the
JT> definitions for a module - so you don't end up with doubled
JT> FvwmForms and FvwmButtons?
DG> If that's what he meant, then I retract my statement. However, I was
DG> under the impression he simply meant renaming KillModule. Even if we
DG> do get a DestroyModule that removes module definitions, we'd still
DG> need KillModule around for stopping Module processes.
I agree... My meaning was ambiguous. As Jarl suggests I was
interested in destroying the Module definition, but was (stupidly)
considering including this to be associated with KillModule, which in
hindsight is NOT a good idea!
So yes I do want a way to destry the definition of a Module,
to more easily facilitate dynamic reconfiguration without restarts
Fergal.
--
Fergal Mc Carthy, Digital, Ballybrit, Galway. fergal_at_ilo.dec.com
Technical Computing Group System Administrator. Ph: +353-91-754149
http://tc-www.ilo.dec.com/~fergal DTN: 822-4149
"a key to the understanding of all religion is that a god's
idea of amusement is Snakes and Ladders with greased rungs."
- Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Tue Mar 26 1996 - 02:52:49 GMT