/ <chuck_hines_at_VNET.IBM.COM> (Charles Hines) wrote:
|
| My standard answer is 'The first official 2.xx release will occur
| "Real Soon Now", whatever "Real Soon Now" actually means'. There is
| still more cleanup that needs to be done, particularily in the docs
| and build process, and then I'll release it, but it will by no means
| be a 'final' release. The items on the TO-DO list will probably never be
| fully completed, and are completely unrelated to the
|
Uhm, don't forget the bugs section from fvwm 1.2's man-pages:
As of fvwm 0.99 there were exactly 39.342 unidentified bugs.
Identified bugs have mostly been fixed, though. Since then
9.34 bugs have been fixed. Assuming that there are at least
10 unidentified bugs for every identified one, that leaves
us with 39.342 - 9.32 + 10 * 9.34 = 123.402 unidentified
bugs. If we follow this to its logical conclusion we will
have an infinite number of unidentified bugs before the
number of bugs can start to diminish, at which point the
program will be bug-free. Since this is a computer program
infinity = 3.4028e+38 if you don't insist on double-
precision. At the current rate of bug discovery we should
expect to achieve this point in 3.37e+27 years. I guess I
better plan on passing this thing on to my children....
Hmm something is wrong here, he (R. Nation) hasn't passed it on to his
children??
/andy (smile)
--
Don't walk in front of me, I might be unable to follow you.
Don't walk after me, I might be unable to lead you.
Just walk by my side and be my friend.
--
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Fri Feb 02 1996 - 13:31:13 GMT