Re: FVWM: Re: Bugs, problems, wishes and praises

From: Charles Hines <>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 16:04:45 -0500

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Powell <medp_at_primag.co.uk> writes:

>> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 09:39:37 -0500 (EST)
>> From: rnation_at_mansvr.sanders.lockheed.com (Robert Nation 885-9815)
>>
>> Its not up to me to decide what is included in fvwm, but I always
>> kept the tcl/tk stuff separate from fvwm, just because tcl/tk is a big
>> package, and not everyone uses it.
>>
>> Its hard enough to explain to people that they need xpm; adding a
>> requirement for tcl/tk would just make it worse.
>>
>> I guess that these packages should be available at the same site/location
>> as fvwm, but either a separate package, or something that is not compiled by
>> default.

Mark> It would be convenient if contributed packages were mirrored at
Mark> the fvwm site but not essential. Please *don't* include things
Mark> like the tcl/tk stuff in the main distribution because it would
Mark> make it much bigger to download.

That's the very reason why I don't intend to include it in the main
distribution.

Mark> *Do* include a list of pointers to other packages though. If
Mark> people want the other stuff we can get it so long as we know
Mark> where to look.

This is what I do intend to do, however. I'm going to put it in the
FAQ.

Chuck
--
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Fri Dec 15 1995 - 15:05:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 29 2016 - 19:37:57 BST