Hello again,
> Christian Aistleitner <tmgisi_at_gmx.at> writes:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So what I was looking for was something like:
>>
>> Style XTerm StartMaximized
>
> Xterm understands X resources.
Thats true. A already got such things working before. I just did not
mention it, since I really want to use FVWMs capabilites for doing such
things.
X resources are not the way I want to go, because I do not think that it
is good, to have configs for applications spread throughout the system.
(That is having defined Stickyness in .fvwm2rc (or some include), while
the geometry is set via a completely different (from the user point of
view)mechanism -- namely X resources.) On the other hand I only used XTerm
to name some application. Indeed I want to do this for more than one
application. And not all of them support X resources. (And begging the
authors of the software for X resource support is NOT the way to go)
Besides:
> #if ( HEIGHT == 900 )
> Rxvt.geometry: 80x55
> #elif ( HEIGHT == 1024 )
> Rxvt.geometry: 80x65
> #elif ( HEIGHT == 768 )
> Rxvt.geometry: 80x47
> #else /* I have no idea... */
> Rxvt.geometry: 80x40
> #endif
would not help either, because :0.1 is of Height 600 ... but you have to
subtract the FvwmButtons Height. :0.2 is also of Height 600, but without
the FvwmButtons. Ok it can be managed to get this working with X resources.
But actually, as I already said in my initial mail, and again in this one:
I am really looking for an FVWM-way, to express the geometry.
Especially since lots of applications do not care about X resources. (Or I
am not able to get them working the way I want them too.)
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Thu Sep 18 2003 - 10:39:12 BST