> I think the most useful would be to organize the config file(s) into
>some canonical structure, so that all themes would have similar
>structure. that way you could get just the keybindings or decoration or
>some other part of theme...
> I guess that's the role of having the fvwm.themes.org, to have some
>kinda of framework. monolithic fvwmrc is fairly flexible, but it makes
>it hard to exchange themes if everybody has competely different
>structure of the file(s).
Ofcoursely, to use a good generic theme format would be better than just
a bunch of everyone's fvwmrc files. But unfortunately a good theme format
doesn't exist yet. The guys at fvwm-themes.dhs.org are developing one,
but I think it's only a pre alpha version. So I guess, casting all themes
in this format would be premature, as the format is likely to change.
So maybe one would have to wait some more until the format reaches a
final state. Or for now, make a preliminary site, with people's setup
files..
Jos.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL: http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_fvwm.org.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_fvwm.org.
Received on Wed Feb 16 2000 - 12:51:17 GMT