"Vlad D. Markov" <markov_at_monmouth.com> writes:
> I appreciate Fvwm's small memory consumption and speed. My computer is
> an old 486 DX66. I prefer not to bring up an interpreter to do common
> tasks. I hope Fvwm does not get bloated.
> --
> Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
> To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
> message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
> To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
>
I agree. That's why I made the point (and will make again) that we should have
at most one interpreter running. I negelected to say that fvwm should work
perfectly nicely without having an interpreter built in as well. That's also a
prerequisite I would want satisfied.
--
Brady Montz
bradym_at_cs.arizona.edu
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/>.
To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm" in the body of a
message to majordomo_at_hpc.uh.edu.
To report problems, send mail to fvwm-owner_at_hpc.uh.edu.
Received on Thu Apr 30 1998 - 22:58:11 BST